Showing posts with label Atheism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Atheism. Show all posts

Friday, June 14, 2013

Finding Yourself

By Adam Taylor


I am fond of saying that “I don’t know who I am, but I know who I was as recently as five minutes ago.”  American culture spends an inordinate amount of time telling us to “find” or “know” ourselves.  More on why that is bullshit in a minute.

I spent the first two-thirds of my life trying to understand myself.  I studied psychology because it seemed like a good enough place to start.  I dabbled in philosophy and theology because I was drawn to the “big questions.” Adulthood is marked by those few moments when you start to finally see a clear image of your identity.  After that you get to undertake the new task of learning to live with this confused and irritating person now inhabiting your body.


For me, one of these markers was the questioning and eventually coming to the conclusion that there is no God.  I say conclusion, but in all practicality this is really a position.  Any logical or scientific understanding is subject to change in light of new, credible information.  This is important to note (ad nauseum) because the vast majority of references to atheism in the media claim that atheists are absolutely certain of their position while the softer “more reasonable” agnostic is just not sure.  Atheists are branded as arrogant for being “certain” that there is no supernatural god by the same people who are certain that there is a god because they believe it really hard and call it “faith.”  When an atheist says that they are not certain that there is no god (because that is supposedly “impossible”) they are derided for not having conviction in their position.  Sometimes this is a genuine misunderstanding of terms like “faith” and “dogma” but it usually boils down to intellectual dishonesty.  I expect to continue being irritated by things like this as the media outlets run brazenly into larger confirmation bias silos.


Not understanding this distinction was the reason I called myself an agnostic for years before I realized that atheist was a more appropriate moniker.  I remember these moments as identity markers in my life.  These were moments when I understood something inexorable about myself.  Again it wasn’t the lack of belief in gods that was unalterable, but the process by which I came to that conclusion was.  Logic.  Evidence.  Exploration.  


Personally, the absence of a divine creator was comforting because it meant that I had no destiny.  I did not have to accept the things that I wanted to change about my life or myself.  I was not designed with a purpose that I needed to uncover or to live up to.  I did not need to drive myself insane trying to decipher the meaning of every event around me.  The significance was mine to assign.  This seemingly terrifies the faithful.  The concept of no ultimate authority over the self is a symptom of a chaotic universe.  Most people can handle not knowing where the bus is going as long as someone is driving.  


Steve is the first open atheist I ever met (way back in 1998).  I was still a believer at that time but I was already challenging what I believed.  Left Hemispheres really began as an extension of all the conversations Steve and I had in college and the email conversations that Steve and I and a few others were still having years later.  The blog was a vehicle to meet and interact with the global network of non-believers that we knew existed but did not really know how to reach.  The blog was also a learning tool.  We set up this network to bring relevant information to the discussion.  We brought our sarcasm and dark humor with us.  Most of all, it was a log of the arguments we were making and a method to formulate and practice those ideas.  We took this concept of “an attempt at rational, secular discourse” and set it loose on an unsuspecting and largely oblivious populace.  It was fun.  Until it wasn’t.  I’m not going to go into the annoyance of the atheosphere.  You can listen to the podcast for that.  It is certainly not the only reason to stop the blog.  It was really just the most recent (and most annoying) reason.  The truth is we’ve said what we came to say.  We have explored these ideas as far as they will go for us, or really, just as much as we care to publically.  We have kicked the hornets’ nest and threw rocks at the giant.  It turns out that most of the hornets don’t have stingers and the giant just stomps his feet and cries “persecution.”  


I want to thank all of the readers and listeners who came along for the ride.  Your comments/questions/arguments have sparked as many off-line conversations as the ones on the blog.  You have shaped our narrative and direction as much as the charlatans whose hypocrisy and hubris we pointed out.  We had more than a few laughs along the way.  To my brothers at Left Hemispheres:  You are scholars of sarcasm.  You are masters of mockery.  I’ve got your back in Rapture or Zombie Apocalypse (equally likely).


Here’s what I have learned:  We don’t need to find ourselves.  We need to find each other.  You know exactly who you are.  You know what you want.  The conflict is that you can’t always have it.  The people who do not understand their identity really just don’t understand their motives.  The world is desperately short on compassion.  Most of us do not live in tribes anymore.  It’s time to stop making love exclusive.  I have learned that our little planet is teeming with people who think like me.  People who weigh evidence over authority.  People who know that the world is small (and round) and that the actions of one can influence many.  If believing that you were designed with a purpose in mind, or that the Universe has feelings keeps you from being an asshole; then by all means...continue.  If you think the Creator is really a warlike, sexist, homophobe who loves you better than anyone else because of the place you were born, it is certainly your right to have that opinion.  Just don’t expect me to let you force-feed it to my children.  Or yours.



Thursday, January 10, 2013

Boxed In



By Adam Taylor

My birthday is in the beginning of January, which means that I typically associate New Year celebrations with getting one year older.  I usually find myself reading philosophy or poetry in some vain attempt to gain new perspectives or approaches to the stress of everyday life.  
Don’t be alarmed, I am not going to bore you with some new life-affirming coda that rephrases things you already know.  My most recently devoured book was 'Mortality' by Christopher Hitchens (thanks to Steve for reminding me that I’m going to die on my birthday).  I recommend this book to anyone who can handle the gravity of a dying intellectual writing about the process of dying.

What I want to talk is something I realized after a conversation with my wife when she was looking for the book. My wife, who is not at all interested in atheism and less so in the “atheosphere;” was trying to find this book based on a vague description, a misremembered phonetic variation on Hitchens’ name, and not knowing if it was in the religion or philosophy sections. Knowing just enough of Hitchens' work, she was skeptical when I told her that it wasn’t really about atheism.  This is my subjective opinion, of course, but the thoughts and ideas of an atheist are not always necessisarily atheistic. We do think of things not related to atheism.

This is as much an aspect of sociology and culture as personal preference.  We tend to accentuate the attributes of a person by what most separates them from the majority.  I recently joked on the podcast that I am a black, left-handed atheist: a minority triumvirate.  These specific minorities rarely affect my life in suburban northeastern America.  I don’t often find myself struggling to operate a chainsaw in the deep south at a CFI convention and in the event of a zombie apocalypse, I would probably travel north.

I am probably more interested in music than atheism actually.  I am also passionately drawn to visual art and film.  I’m a hell of a dancer too..but that might be a black thing.  

Most of these particular traits stay neatly compartmentalized.  My atheism may color my worldview (or uncolor it), but it is hardly my sole outlook on life.  The god question does not really apply to everyday life choices and I don’t go out of my way to avoid religious themes in the art, music or literature that I consume.  Some in the atheist movement actively shun things that don’t fit into their atheism box.  This became so problematic to maintain that a few idealistic individuals tried to re-brand atheism to include political and pro-social movements not without controversy.  I don’t actually care about Atheism+, it is just the example that comes to mind.  I think it may resonate with some people because it is an attempt at combining the many compartmental ideals that individual athiests hold into an atheistic community.  Others, [insert broad liberal theism observation] tend to separate their interests and perspectives into a bento-style segregation: science here, spirituality there, political affiliations next to the sashimi.

So how do we find balance?  How do we keep from trying to fit our identity into one stretched out box or keep our interests neatly categorized in mental filing cabinets?  I don’t have any idea but as far as cultural concepts go: fusion is much more prevalent in the modern age than purity.  Ideologues may be useful to other ideologues, but they are pretty unbearable to everyone else.


The issue at hand is discomfort.  Most of our behaviors are motivated either by our desire to obtain something or to avoid something.  Most of our belief systems are global precisely because  contradictory beliefs are anxiety producing.  One needs to blur the lines or overlook aspects of conflicting belief systems to avoid cognitive dissonance.  The same goes for mental operational philosophies.  Skeptics who tout reason and logic as the only tools in the box are undermining emotional decision-making and intuitive problem-solving.  Over-compartmentalizing leads to cognitive blind spots.  A person can selectively ignore aspects of an idea that are inconsistent with their worldview via confirmation or availability bias. 

We don't need more boxes or bigger boxes. I think we need to accept that our mental lives are messy.  Myself included.  I'm going to try to appreciate the complexity of the human condition and give the categories a rest.   

Saturday, December 1, 2012

PSA: Don't Buy Xmas Trees From the Boys Scouts of America


As most everyone is aware, the Boys Scouts insist on discriminating against homosexual and atheist youth in the name of patriotism and religion. We here at Left Hemispheres and many of our friends across the blogosphere/atheosphere are asking people of conscience, religious and irreligious alike, to refrain from buying your Xmas trees from them. The money raised by the sale of trees explicitly funds a discriminatory organization and implicitly supports their policies.

To see other posts on this subject (and probably a lot better than mine) please check out the participating blogs below. This isn’t a comprehensive list as the organizers are still rounding them up. Please go check out some other perspectives.


Thursday, October 11, 2012

Why LH?


Why the hell are we doing this?

This is a question that has been asked a quite few times during our back channel discussions.  It seems like week after week we are beating our heads against a wall of stupidity. And every time we make a crack or knock out a block, theists slap up the same brick of idiocy and adhere it with the mortar of repetition.  Not to mention all of the ridiculous bullshit that has been going on in the Atheosphere.  We’re a small blog.  Our readership is mostly a handful of regulars (and we thank you, one and all).  Even on Facebook and G+ we only have a few hundred followers, while pages that do nothing but re-post the same tired memes get tens of thousands.  We’re lucky to get one comment compared to the hundreds that “Global Secular Humanist Movement” or an FtB post gets, even though we’re sometimes weeks ahead in getting a story out.  And admittedly, one of us does the majority of the heavy lifting around here (It’s not me), which has to be tiring for him.  So why are we still doing this?  

I’d like to think that we’re helping to stem the tide, but I don’t know, because we don’t get the feedback.  We don’t even have theocracy-promoting trolls to use as a gauge.  And I’m not sure why.   Is it the layout?  Our writing?  Is it the quagmire that is Blogspot? 

Despite all this, we do continue on.  We've even expanded by starting to do a podcast, which I think is going pretty well.  I got to interview Taylor Muse of Quiet Company, and participate as a member of the press at Rock Beyond Belief.  I hope to do more like that.    

The mainstream media only picks up the stuff that appeals to our community when it can be spun into some sensationalist pap in support of the status quo, or to warn them of the “atheist threat” (The Black Hand is coming!).  This is the main reason why bloggers, vloggers, public speakers and authors are so vital to the secular community.  As Jello Biafra once said, “Don’t hate the media, become the media!”  So, for me, that’s why I do this.  That’s why I want to continue to do this. 

We live in a society that is still dancing to the beat of an imaginary drum; and without those voices, however small, to bring attention to that fact, the creeps organizing the conga line win. 

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

History of Atheism by Steven Goldman


via Dr. Peter Boghossian's Atheism class at Portland State University

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Starting From Zero

I’ve had two diverging reactions to my atheism lately.  

About two weeks ago, I was talking to a co-worker who totally agreed with my political views.  Somewhere in the midst of my critique on the Republican platform I mentioned that I was an atheist.  

*Record scratch*

She turned without saying another word and walked away.  My immediate thought, “maybe I said something out loud that was different than what I said in my head.”  Was this the onset of Tourette’s?  Did I just say something racist, sexist, or talk about my favorite side dish when I eat a baby?  Nope.  Just the word: atheist.  

Last week, I was involved in a 3-person conversation (a “conversation à trois”) when my friend who I’ll call the “Doubting Theist” says to the third party, “Hey, did you know that Adam is an atheist?”  My Doubting Theist friend was hoping to spark  a lively debate about Life, the Universe and Everything (see 42).  This other person said that I was “crazy” and “delusional” and that my life must be “depressing.”  This went on for several minutes.  I know what you’re thinking: Left Hemispheres guy --gave a profound, well reasoned, slightly sarcastic argument for non-belief in god or gods in 140 characters or less.  Right?  Well no actually, I didn’t really have anything to say because I could not stop thinking about the other person from the week before.  

Both of these people were immediately upset and surprised--shocked even--that someone could possibly hold my worldview, or probably more accurately, not hold theirs.  I find myself equally surprised when I encounter this reaction.  They seemed appalled that atheism is even possible.  I think this is the case because they were approaching this question starting from a position of faith.  Confirmation bias makes God seem self-evident.  It takes tremendous initial effort to think about theism critically or objectively.  I know this because I used to be one of these people.  

When starting from faith, alternatives are rarely considered even as a thought experiment.  To conceptualize atheism as valid is to imagine a world without the god you “know” exists.  You look at it as a -1.   More than just a God, then no-God. An atheist was a person who lives without my (personal) God.  To imagine a world that you believe is an expression of God’s love without God is like imagining a world without a world. The concept needs to be approached with neutrality-- from zero.

I was raised Lutheran and had a childhood friend who was Catholic.  I was fascinated to hear about Purgatory.  I understood it to be a sort of cosmic waiting room whereas I had direct delivery to heaven or hell.  I remember having the same bemused sense of novelty as when his mother put the peanut butter and the jelly on the same slice of bread when making a PB&J sandwich (not like our house!).  So I was fortunate enough to have an anxiety-free opportunity to look at my beliefs as my Catholic friend would see them.  Then, as the Jehovah's Witness girl in my classroom.  Then as a Muslim, a Buddhist, a Hindu. With each religion or worldview I came into contact with I tried my best to put on their glasses and look at the world.  

My approach to faith was very much like that eye exam where the doctor keeps changing lenses until the blurred letters become clear.  Some of those lenses could be placed over my existing lense to add to the overall quality of the image.  Some religions or outlooks would bring certain areas into sharp focus while obscuring others.  Some lenses make a mess of everything and can be discarded immediately

  • The world is all connected (yes!) by an invisible/intangible force in command (huh?).  
  • Everyone is loved by God (OK) except those people (really?)  
  • Every positive or negative action will return to you (maybe) as you go through a series of reincarnations as various animals or humans until you get it right (what?)

I had to look at the situation from the perspective of other faiths before I could look at it without any faith at all.  I had to go through several versions of -1 until I found “Zero.”  I relinquished every notion of supernaturalism.  I started each question without the preconceived dogma and without the baggage of trying to bend facts to fit a theology.  Using religion to explain the world is like trying to fill a circle with triangles.  No amount of effort will make a complete picture.  This is the reason religious claims rely so heavily on faith.  Faith that the shape one sees isn’t actually real, but it really looks like “this.” Faith that the pieces don’t matter.  Faith in the person who first tells you that,  “A triangle is not a triangle because God.”

This may help to explain the notions of how depressing it must be to “believe in nothing.”  Or the “You are just angry at God” sentiment.  They think that they are objectively looking at a godless worldview but they are missing the point.  They are in fact looking at their life without their God.  This could even explain the smug atheist paradigm.  I was able to step outside of myself and look at the world.  But for reasons I can't fathom, you won't even consider it.  It makes us angry because it seems obvious.  Many of us forget what those first furtive steps into godlessness felt like.  Once you’ve done it, it seems easy.  I have Taoism and later Zen Buddhism to thank for giving me the concept of No Mind.  To actualize nothing.  To start at the beginning with no specific intention toward an outcome.  It’s liberating (at least until the Buddha gets in your way) .

I continue to do this.  I constantly reevaluate my positions.  I ask myself why I believe what I believe.  I try to look at the evidence for every claim (especially my own).  I ask myself: would I believe this if I was hearing it for the first time?   If we are going to claim the intellectual high ground on what may be the most important existential questions: who we are and why we exist, then we need to be courageous enough to doubt ourselves.  Take a moment and look at your own claims first from faith, then from zero.  Follow the trail to truth wherever it leads.  If you find yourself back where you started, pat yourself on the back and blaze a new path.

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Left Hemispheres Podcast Ep.03-Kill that Buddha



This week we discuss the Islamic riots, coming out as an atheist, killing the Buddha, and water-ballons. Also, if you'd like to be more involved in the podcast you can email us at lefthemispheres@gmail.com, find us on facebook, Google+, or twitter (@lefthemispheres). Of course you can always comment here with any questions, comments, topic ideas, submissions for the Poe/Troll of the week segment we're hoping to start up, or just to say hi.



Show Notes:
  1. Intro -
    1. Tuesday September 18th, 2012
  2. ‘The Innocence of Muslims” Controversy
    1. Background
      1. Anti-Islam film: More details emerge about filmmaker
    2. Reactions
      1. Blame the Killers—Not a YouTube Movie
      2. Muslim Rage & The Last Gasp of Islamic Hate - by Ayaan Hirsi Ali
      3. Newsweek Publishes Islamophobic ‘Muslim Rage’ Cover In Response To Embassy Attacks
      4. These imbecilic riots must serve to reinforce our commitment to freedom
      5. 'This Does Not Represent Us': Moving Photos of Pro-American Rallies in Libya
      6. 'Muslim Rage' Explodes On Twitter, But In A Funny Way (Yes, Really)
      7. No One Murdered Because Of This Image
      8. The Absurd Logic of Apologizing for Islam
      9. Guest Post: Islamophobia vs. Racism
    3. Muslim hypocrisy
      1. An Arab language film about Jewish blood-libel from Jordan
      2. Palestinian children's program
  3. Guide to Deconversion (Part 1): How to Come Out (and Why!)
  4. Killing the Buddha
  5. Penn State Group to "Stone an Atheist"

Check out this episode!

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Penn State Group to "Stone an Atheist"

photo via the PSU AAA site.
Also, I really like the use of the null set. 

“Have a dollar and want to throw something at heathens? Well then here’s the event for you.”  via Onward State
The Penn State Atheist/Agnostic Associate is holding a unique event to raise funds for charity. The event entitled “Stone an Atheist” will have AAA students offering themselves up to get “stoned” (not the 420 kind) with water balloons. Anyone can come up and purchase water balloons and “stone” the godless. The charity, VillageReach, is a non-profit providing medical supplies and sustainable health care training for third world countries.

If you’re a Penn State student, faculty, “townie”, or the Willard Preacher; you can find the “Stone an Atheist” event on the HUB lawn  September 18-21, 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

Sidenote: I’m sure most will participate for fun, but I have to believe some people will really be throwing those balloons with some extra smite on them.




UPDATE: From some of the comments at Onward State and at least one other atheist blogger it seems like some people think this isn't a good idea or that it's in bad taste. To them I say "Lighten the fuck up!" Many are comparing this event to Ernest Perce V's Zombie Mohammad or his proposed and idiotic Quran whipping. That is a false analogy and just plain lazy criticism as this event isn’t designed to inflame anyone’s sensibilities. Getting pelted by water balloons for charity can only offend or inflame those that take things too seriously or who would really want to stone themselves an atheist. This is a good natured joke. If anyone is the “butt of the joke” it’s those that can’t see it, theist or atheist.

It is a good opportunity for atheists to present themselves with a sense of humor instead of the false stereotype of glum, miserable people (which is dumb considering many atheists love Douglas Adams, Bill Hicks, etc.). It is an opportunity for theists to engage this group of atheists in a funny manner and see that some of us at least, really don’t take ourselves too seriously.

After getting pelted, the Atheists/Agnostic Association will be answering questions and are open to a dialogue.

AWFUL, insensitive stuff, I know.  <sarcasm font>


Thursday, August 23, 2012

I'm Sorry That I Don't Care About Atheism+


I'm Sorry.  I really am.

I read.  Day and night, I absorb as much information as I can withstand.  I have a job and a family and I actually like both of them most of the time.  If I lived alone in a cave (with wi-fi) I would read around the clock and would further my personal education in matters of science, philosophy, ethics & literature.  I would read that copy of The Picture of Dorian Gray that Steve got me for my birthday in 2004.  I would take a really solid crack at Kant's Metaphysics.  I would read the Bible, the Qur’an, the Tao Te Ching.  I would surely double the Internet intake of essays and blog posts about all things Atheistic.

I would probably read all of the posts buzzing about the revolutionary concept of A+ and how it adds (or takes away) from the existing brand of atheism.  With all of these other things competing for my attention I simply do not have the time or inclination.  I have trouble getting past the first few paragraphs of almost everything I read on the subject.  I have read a few interesting takes on it but it all boils down to who is allowed to sit with the cool kids at the lunch table.

I am fully aware of the controversy that sparked this manufactured movement and I can identify with the frustration of anyone who feels that they are being treated unfairly.  Obviously, I find rape/death threats and misogyny toward any woman abhorrent.  I am further disgusted that it happens in any form inside a community that I am a part of.  None of these things have anything to do with atheism.

There seems to be this belief that atheism existed in some alternate form pre-2001 then suddenly burst into public consciousness when people actually started asking non-believers what they thought about 9/11.  Back then; many atheists were disenchanted from religion for Humanist reasons (slavery, sexism, bigotry etc).  When technology allowed for us to reach each other and the web-log gave everyone a voice and a potential audience, the subsequent burst of ideas was labeled “New Atheism”.  We have spent more than enough time discussing that topic on this blog.  I don’t accept this “wave of atheism” theory.  I think it’s closer to a “wave of atheism awareness”.

Now, eleven years later it seems like people who pride themselves on freethought are upset when their “movement” doesn’t mirror all of their ideas.  Again, I’m not opposed to any of the ideas of the Atheist+ label.  In fact it is damn close to my personal ideology. That’s why I’m so bored with it.

I am an atheist and a secular humanist and a progressive and a feminist.  I’m a rationalist and a naturalist and a skeptic.  I’m a bit of a materialist, a Darwinist and a Neil DeGrasse Tysonist (the last one doesn't exist but it should).

I am all of these things, but I'm also none of them. The problem isn't that I haven't found the correct label for myself the problem is a tendency to try to find a label at all. I will not fall into the vortex of a parallel universe where cats are herd animals. I can't make myself care about a new title that will be just as inadequate at describing my beliefs as all the others.  And I feel little bad about it.  I do.  But I have so many other things to read.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Random Quotes of Insufferable Divisive Rhetoric: Richard Carrier


Richard Carrier exposes the divisiveness of some of the Atheism+ proponents. I ask anyone how this is constructive or defensible. This is a typical “You’re either with us or against us” false dichotomy and Carrier should know better.   

“There is a new atheism brewing, and it’s the rift we need, to cut free the dead weight so we can kick the C.H.U.D.’s back into the sewers and finally disown them, once and for all. 

“…I call everyone now to pick sides (not in comments here, but publicly, via Facebook or other social media): are you with us, or with them; are you now a part of the Atheism+ movement, or are you going to stick with Atheism Less?Then at least we’ll know who to work with. And who to avoid.”



update: Now complete with "enemy" rhetoric
http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/archives/2207/comment-page-1/#comment-20317
http://freethoughtblogs.com/carrier/archives/2207/comment-page-1/#comment-20357

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Dear Son...

I don't know the authenticity or the provenience of this particular letter, but we all know this happens.

Dear Son,

After you came out as an atheist last week me and your mother agreed that we would simply let you be since it is clearly a phase you’re going through. But we have argued, and now until you accept God again, you are not welcome in my home. I am not having my family’s safety sacrificed because of your arrogance and hubris. You have until the 16th to pick up your things.

                                                                               Dad






Thursday, August 9, 2012